Posts Tagged: Brand


11
Oct 09

McDonalds and the Louvre: McLouvre?

Next time you visit the Mona Lisa, would you want to get a whiff of greasy fries? McDonalds recently announced it is going to set-up shop in the Louvre. Though McDonalds will try to create a high-end atmosphere, it is a true clash of brands: prestigious art museum meets low-grade, homogeneous fast-food.

From a branding standpoint, this move is not one that will benefit the Louvre. By introducing cheap fast food to a museum known for its class and beauty, ultimately, it will lose charm and appeal. It’s about keeping on-brand.

Consider Isaac Mizrahi’s decision to feature his designs in Target. Yes, Target is a national chain. However, of the national chains, Target is most on-brand for Mizrahi. If the high-end designer were to be featured in Wal-Mart, he would be making a “McLouvre.”

When considering cross promotions and brand affiliations it is crucial to make sure it’s on-brand. When you think of Target, it’s higher end than market competitors, however when you think of the Louvre, the last restaurant that would come to mind would be McDonalds. A brand clash might help one brand (i.e. McDonalds), but could be to the detriment of the other (i.e. the Louvre).


26
Sep 09

Under Armour Doesn’t Care About Me

As most people that buy gym memberships after the holidays, I was really excited about getting into shape. To prepare for my new look, I went to the Under Armour outfitter to buy some work out clothes.

I’m a small guy, so I was surprised when all of the gym attire could hardly make it past my arms. My god I thought, should I have been working out before I bought my work out clothes? I’ve seen enormous football players, five times my size, fit into these shirts. After I was able to fit into a large (I’m a small), I looked like I’d gained 50 pounds.

Discouraged, I went with Reebok, because I could fit into a medium shirt. On the way home, I realized something– I’m not supposed to wear Under Armour. The designers at Under Armour do not want me to buy their clothing. I’m a skinny guy just under six feet tall. Had they wanted me to buy their apparel, they would have used the Reebok design. Instead, they made up their mind that the only people that could fit into their clothes and function properly are athletes.

Guys with muscles and 0% body fat are supposed to wear Under Armor and that’s why they’ve been so successful. They haven’t compromised or diluted their brand by chasing after people that don’t matter. I matter to Reebok, not Under Armor. The barriers Under Armour has created to gate-in a very specific community has ultimately made them successful.

Tinkerbell Personal Checks |Garden Planters | Jewellery For Women | Best Dog Foods | Budget Wedding Gowns | Shop For Jewellery | Vintage Jewellery| Diamante Jewellery | Car Finance Credit | DoorStep Loans